The threat by the Kaduna State governor, Nasir Ahmad el’Rufai that foreign observers who meddle in Nigeria’s elections would return home in body bags, and the strongly-worded statement by the spokesman of the All Progressives Congress, APC campaign Council, Festus Keyamo, senior advocate of Nigeria, SAN, in which he accused the United States of America of interfering with the presidential election by allegedly supporting the opposition presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has elicited reaction from a London-based group, Friends of Atiku, who believe that the United Kingdom, the United States of America and the European Union, EU, have not done or said anything to indicate bias against the ruling party.
At a solidarityconference in London by Friends of Atiku, United Kingdom chapter, a few daysago, guest speaker, Isaiah Osifo, Doctor of Political Science, and lecturer inthe department of political science and public administration, IgbinedionUniversity, Okada, posited that international law allows internationalcommunity to intervene and support the enthronement of sustainable democracythrough the instrumentality of a free and fair election. Osifo, who is the EdoState co-ordinator of Friends of Atiku, insisted that “the UK, US, EU and otherlovers of democracy have not violated the sovereignty of Nigeria nor have theyviolated any international law in their determination to support a free andfair election in Nigeria”. He said Nigerians are indeed grateful to thegovernment and people of the United Kingdom and other democracies in the world“for this interventionist policy of supporting democracy and free and fairelection in Nigeria”.
According to Osifo,this act of humanitarian intervention is a gesture Nigerians would continue toappreciate, stressing that “It is not for Atiku; it is for all Nigerians. Weshould have a political system whereby the citizens will be the determiningfactor of who should govern them”. Drawing a parallel between intervention andinterference, Osifo explained that “intervention is not the same thing asinterference. Intervention is a support for the institutions and the system toachieve resilience, professionalism and independence to conduct a free and fairelection. Interference is when external powers attempt to influence the choiceof a candidate by influencing the electorates to vote for a particularcandidate. The UK, US, EU, etc. cannot be accused of interference in ourinternal affairs or violating our sovereignty, because they have not askedNigerians to vote for a particular candidate, but they are interested in apeaceful, free and fair election that will enable Nigerians to freely elect thepresident of their choice.”
Enumerating the achievements of the PDP in its 16 years as Nigeria’s ruling party especially in the areas of the economy, judicial reforms and bequeathing a culture of free and fair election to the country, Osifo said nobody had expected the APC federal government to address all the problems of Nigeria in four years. He said Nigerians, however, expected the APC government to consolidate on the achievements of successive PDP governments and lay a foundation for a positive direction. He regretted that the APC inherited the fastest growing economy in Africa, “but today, the Nigeria economy is near collapse. Industries are closing or relocating to other countries, the unemployment rate is the highest since Nigeria’s independence. APC claims to be prudent in finances and boasts of a record of high internal revenue, but these figures do not reflect in our national budget and public expenditure. The external debts Obasanjo/Atiku administration fully paid have returned in a high burden of billions of dollars”.
Osifo also lamented that the gains of democracy and rule of law inherited from PDP administration by APC federal government have been eroded by president Buhari and his APC government. He said while the APC government has not contributed any policy or law to improve the conduct of a free and fair election in Nigeria on the basis of which Buhari was elected in 2015, “under the Buhari/APC administration, Nigerians are now under the burden of begging the INEC chairman appointed by President Buhari to conduct a free and fair election”.
[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]
Also faulting theanti-corruption policy of the present government, Osifo described it as a ruseand deliberately targeted at members of opposition political party or perceivedenemies of the president. Citing examples, he noted that the national chairmanof APC, Adams Oshiomhole has a petition written against him since 2016 oncorrupt enrichment and embezzlement of Edo state funds when he was serving asthe governor of Edo state “but up till this moment, three years after thereceipt of the petition by the EFCC, no attempt has been made to look into themerit or otherwise of the petition”. He similarly recalled that “in 2016, thesame Adams Oshiomhole as governor of Edo state invited president Buhari tocommission his so-called five-star hospital that he claimed to have constructedwith billions of Naira of Edo state money. More than two years after thecommissioning of the hospital by president Buhari, the hospital is still underlock and key and taken over by weeds and reptiles”. Osifo also recalled how theDirector-General of Buhari’s presidential election campaign and former governorof Rivers state, Rotimi Amaechi was indicted by Rivers state JudicialCommission of Inquiry for embezzlement of Rivers State money. “The indictmentby an authorised state government was ignored by Buhari/APC administration, andsuch personality is the best man to be appointed as Campaign Director-Generalby a president that is claiming to be fighting corruption”, he stated.According to him, even if the indictment was interpreted to be political, ananti-corruption government has the moral burden to accept the decision orsubject the report of the inquiry to a review or an investigation of the EFCCto inform Nigerians on the second opinion of the federal government and whythey are ignoring the report. He described the present-day Nigeria underpresident Buhari as “a text book definition of the mode of fighting corruptionby a dictator”.
Osifo charged Friendsof Atiku to be committed to rescue Nigeria from the dictatorial hold ofBuhari/APC, stressing that the approach to this will be the total mobilisationof all good men and women of Nigeria to elect Atiku Abubakar as the presidentof Nigeria in the 2019 presidential election. He believed that Atiku’s visionon restructuring, privatization and diversification of the economy, commitmentto the unity of Nigeria, fight against terrorism and violent crimes, and so on,would restore Nigeria to the path of a functional state and respect in thecomity of nations. Defending the position of Atiku on privatising the NigerianNational Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, Osifo argued that it would free hugeamount of money for the economy, stimulate investments, make petrol productssurplus, and drive major economic competitiveness. The outcome of these, hesaid, would be massive employment, income generation for government, householdand general economic prosperity. He also believed that the privatizationof NNPC and diversification of the economy from oil to agriculture and solidminerals will boost the economy of Nigeria. Excited about the recentendorsements of Atiku by leaders of the dominant social-cultural associationsin Nigeria, namely Pan Niger-Delta Development Forum, (PANDEF), Afenifere, theOhaeneze N’digbo, Norther Leaders Forum and the Leadership of the middle-BeltForum, Osifo said it is an attestation to his good character and generalacceptance by Nigerians. While stating that Atiku’s presidency would promotethe unity of Nigeria, Osifo concluded that “Atiku represents a recipe for theunity of Nigeria and an instrument to put end to terrorism in Nigeria. Atiku isa strong advocate of institutionalism and rule of law. The only sustainablemeans of fighting corruption in democratic countries are support for stronginstitutions and rule of law. Atiku will fight corruption by supporting andrespecting the independence of the institutions vested with this responsibilityand by adhering strictly to the principles of the rule of law”.
In a communique at the end of the conference, the Friends of Atiku called on the international community and agencies, notably African Union, AU, UK, USA, EU, and Canada not to be distracted but to ensure close monitoring of the conduct of the election and announcement of results to ensure credible, free and fair process and outcome. The communiqué, signed by Iyore Monday Ugiagbe, co-ordinator, Friends of Atiku, UK chapter, and witnessed by Osifo, the group also called on the federal government to safeguard the lives of the citizenry and to ensure a safe, free and fair election February 16. Friends of Atiku, UK, further charged the law enforcement agencies to ensure that the evil practice of vote-buying and any other electoral malpractices were not allowed during the elections. Ugiagbe had earlier in his address, stated that the group was